Journal Title : International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Science

Author’s Name : Dain Thomas | Sruthi K Chandran  unnamed

Volume 03 Issue 06 2016

ISSN no:  2348-3121

Page no: 165-170

Abstract – Recent earthquakes in which many concrete structures have been severely damaged or collapsed, have indicated the need for evaluating the seismic adequacy of existing buildings. About 60% of the land area of our country is susceptible to damaging levels of seismic hazard. One of the procedures is the nonlinear static pushover analysis which is becoming a popular tool for seismic performance evaluation of existing and new structures. By conducting this pushover analysis, we can know the weak zones in the structure and then we will decide whether the particular part is to be retrofitted or rehabilitated according to the requirement. In the present study the push over analysis is performed on RC building frames by changing the footing, infill wall, aspect ratio and introduction of bracings on the SAP2000 (version 14). These four features have the capacity to increase the seismic performance of the building and the bracings can be used for retrofitting for buildings which are structurally weak.

KeywordsAspect ratio, Pushover anlaysis, Bracings, RC building frame 


  1. IS 875 Part 1, 2, 3 and 4, (1987),”Indian Standard Code of practice for Design loads for Buildings and structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi.
  2. IS: 456 (Fourth Revision),(2000),”Indian standard code for practice for plain reinforced Concrete for general building construction”, Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi.
  3. IS 1893 Part 1, (2002),”Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi Haselton, C.B. and G.G. Deierlein (2007). “Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings”, Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center Technical Report No. 156, Stanford University, 313 pp.
  4. Deodhar, S. V. and A. N. Patel (1998) Ultimate strength of masonry in filled steel frames under horizontal load”, Journal of Structural Engineering. Structural Engineering Research Centre. 24.237-241.
  5. Das, S. (2000),”Seismic design of vertically irregular reinforced concrete structures”, Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University”, Raleigh. NC
  6. Akbas, B., Kara, F.I., and Tugsal, U.M. (2003), “Comparison of Pushover Analysis and Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis on Low-, Medium and High-Rise Steel Frames”, Project No. 02-A-02-01-03, Scientific Research Project Fund, Gebze Institute of Technology
  7. ATC 40, (1996), “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”, Applied Technology Council, USA