Journal Title : International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Science


Author’s Name : Arun N V | Dr Sreevidya V  unnamed

Volume 03 Issue 08 2016

ISSN no:  2348-3121

Page no: 159-162

Abstract – Cement a byproduct of the natural resources is at a high requirement, which is both economically and environmentally backward. Taking up this issue and considering various supplementary materials, of which flyash and GGBS(Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag) on combination provides much better results. Flyash is a common supplementary pozzolanic material, which is a byproduct from Thermal Power Plants. It enhances the mechanical properties of mortar without altering the conventional properties. GGBS , which is also a supplementary pozzolanic material, admixture and a byproduct from production of Iron and steel-making. It enhances the mechanical properties, increases cohesion and reduces bleeding and permeability. Geopolymer mortar is an innovative and green sense composite material for construction, which is obtained by chemical action of inorganic molecules. This composite material does not utilize ordinary Portland cement where in place flyash and GGBS is used in a blended form. Geopolymer is a low carbon dioxide cementitious material when compared to ordinary Portland cement, as it does not depend on calcination process of limestone that produces carbon dioxide. The binder used in geopolymer is sodium based alkaline activators. Studies were carried on various combination with GGBS blending on 25 percentage – 75 percentage. Engineering properties were evaluated and the optimum replacement was determined. Thus the results are evaluated and analyzed. 

Keywords— Light Weight Concrete; Vermiculite Aggregate; Perlite Aggregate; Material Preoperties; Hardened Properties 


  1. AphaSathonsaowaphaks, PrinyaChindaprasirt, KedsarinPimraksa, “Workability And Strength of Lignite Bottom Ash Geopolymer Mortar” (2009).
  2. ThanushThampi“Strength Studies On Geopolymer Mortar For Ferro Geopolymer Water Tank”, International Journal Of Advanced Structures & Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.3, No.2(2014)
  3. Djwantoro Hardjito, Chua Chung Cheak & Carrie Ho Lee Ing (2008),‘Strength And Setting Times of Low Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar’, Mordern Applied Science, Vol.2, No.4, Pp 9-18
  4. Dr.R.Malathy, (2009) Professor& Head, Civil Engineering Konguengg. College, Perundurai, India “Fresh And Hardened Properties of Geo Polymer Concrete And Mortar .”
  5. M.Komljenovic,Z.Bascarevic, V. Bradic (2010), ‘Mechanical And Microstructural Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Geopolymers’, Journal of Hazardous Material, Vol.181, Issue 1-3, Pp 35-42
  6. Michaela Steinerova, (2011) “Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Mortars In Relation To Their Porous Structure” institute of Rock Structure And Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of The Czech Republic.
  7. S. Songpiriyakij (2007), ‘Effect of Temperature On Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar’, Silikaty 48(4), Pp.183-197.
  8. Suresh Thokchom, Dr.ParthaGhosh And Dr.Somnathghosh, (2009) “Acid Resistance of Flyash Based Geopolymer Mortars”, International Journal of Recent Trends In Engineering Vol. 1 No. 6, May, Pp.36-40.
  9. V. Sreevidya, R. Anuradha, D. Dinakar, Dr. R. Venkatasubramani (2012) “Acid Resistance of Flyash Based Geopolymer Mortar Under Ambient Curing And Heat Curing”International Journal of Engineering Science And Technology, Vol. 4, No.02 Pp 681-684.
  10. Vanchaisata, AphaSathonsaowaphak, PrinyaChindaprasirt, (2012) ‘Resistance of Lignite Bottom Ash Geopolymer Mortar To Sulfate And Sulfuric Acid Attack’, Cement & Concrete Composites, Vol-34, Pp 700-708.