IJMTES – ANALYZING OF LOCALIZATION TIME BY PACKET SCHEDULING IN UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC SENSOR NETWORK

Journal Title : International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Science

Author’s Name : G Archana Kumari  unnamed

Volume 03 Issue 09 2016

ISSN no:  2348-3121

Page no: 4-7

Abstract – The main role of WSN is to collect information from various resources and to transfer them to the destination. The important thing is to know the location of the destination, which can be obtained through localization technique in WSN. It is highly desirable to design efficient, low-cost and measurable localization mechanism for under water acoustic WSN. Mostly, in under water acoustic WSN the time and efficiency of the sensors are inversely proportional to each other. If a sensor node takes much time to transmit an information, the efficiency will be reduced due to its low bandwidth capacity. Previous  approaches have implemented schemes to reduce the localization time but they are not much efficient and so packet scheduling is not proper. Moreover it does not provide exact information about proper delivery of data. In order to overcome this challenges this project reduces the localization time to a great extend using L-MAC-IS. It remedies the demerits of the existing method and provides better performance over localization and enhances network lifetime.

Keywords— localization, scheduling, enhanced lifetime 

Reference

  1. G. Han, J. Jiang, L. Shu, Y. Xu, and F. Wang, “Localization algorithms of underwater wireless sensor networks: A survey,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2026–2061, 2012.
  2. H. Ramezani and G. Leus, “Ranging in an underwater medium with multiple isogradient sound speed profile layers,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2996–3017, 2012.
  3. C. Petrioli, R. Petroccia, and M. Stojanovic, “A comparative performance evaluation of MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks,” in Proc. OCEANS 2008, 2008, pp. 1–10.
  4. S. Park and J. Lim, “A parallel transmission schem for all-to-a broadcast in underwater sensor network,” IEICE-Trans. COMM., vol.E93-B, no. 9, pp. 2309–2315, Sept. 2010
  5. G. Han, J. Jiang, L. Shu, Y. Xu, and F. Wang, “Localization algorithms of underwater wireless sensor networks: A survey,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2026–2061, 2012.
  6. M. Erol-Kantarci, H. T. Mouftah, and S. Oktug, “A survey of architectures and localization techniques for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 487–502, 2011.
  7. M. Stojanovic and J. Preisig, “Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2009.
  8. H. Jamali-Rad, H. Ramezani, and G. Leus, “Sparsity-aware multi-source RSS localization,” Elsevier Signal Processing, vol. 101, pp. 174–191, 2014
  9. P. Kuakowski, J. Vales-Alonso, E. Egea-Lpez, W. Ludwin, and J. Garca- Haro, “Angle-of-arrival localization based on antenna arrays for wireless sensor networks,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1181 – 1186, 2010.
  10. S. Madden, M.J. Franklin, j.M. Hellerstein, W.Hong, “TAG: a Tiny AGgregation Service for Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks”, 5th Annual Symposium on Operating Systems Design & Implementation, December 2002.
  11. C.-C. Hsu, K.-F. Lai, C.-F. Chou, and K. C.-J. Lin, “ST-MAC: Spatialtemporal MAC scheduling for underwater sensor networks,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2009, 2009, pp. 1827–1835.
  12. K. Kredo, P. Djukic, and P. Mohapatra, “STUMP: Exploiting position diversity in the staggered TDMA underwater MAC protocol,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2009, 2009, pp. 2961–2965.
  13. M. K. Watfa, T. Nsouli, M. Al-Ayache, and O. Ayyash, “Reactive localization in underwater wireless sensor networks,” in International Conference on Computer and Network Technology (ICCNT), 2010 Second. IEEE, 2010, pp. 244–248.
  14. J.-P. Kim, H.-P. Tan, and H.-S. Cho, “Impact of MAC on localization in large-scale seabed sensor networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), 2011, pp. 391–396.
  15. M. Stojanovic, “On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel,” SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 34–43, Oct. 2007.
  16. S. P. Chepuri, G. Leus, and A.-J. van der Veen, “Sparsity-exploiting anchor placement for localization in sensor networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.4085, 2013.
  17. R. Stuart, “Acoustic digital spread spectrum: An enabling technology,” Sea Technology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 15–20, 2005.
  18. X. Cheng, H. Shu, and Q. Liang, “A range-difference based selfpositioning scheme for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” in Wireless Algorithms, Systems and Applications, 2007. WASA 2007. International Conference on, pp. 38–43.
  19. A.-K. Othman, “GPS-less localization protocol for underwate acoustic networks,” in International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, 2008. WOCN’08. 5th IFIP. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–6.
Scroll Up