Journal Title : International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Science


Author’s Name : S Nagaraj | D Jaya Kumar

Volume 04 Issue 11 2017

ISSN no:  2348-3121

Page no: 11-12

Abstract – Revolutionary disintegrate is a series reaction of disasters that propagates either throughout or a portion of the structure disproportionate to the authentic local failure. The innovative crumble of constructing shape is initiated while one or greater vertical load carrying participants are eliminated. once a column is eliminated or made susceptible, because of guy-made or natural risks, load carried through column removed is transferred to neighbouring columns inside the shape, if the neighbouring column is incapable of withstanding the extra load, results in the progressive failure of adjoining contributors and sooner or later to the failure of partial or entire shape. The collapsing device continually seeks alternative load paths so as to live to tell the tale. one of the essential characteristics of modern crumble is that the final damage isn’t always proportional to the initial damage. The research material available for progressive fall apart failure of systems suggests that buildings designed to face up to seismic actions have properly robustness against innovative crumble. however, no particular investigations have been performed thus far to assess this robustness. hence this take a look at is made to study the capacity ability of seismically designed constructing against revolutionary collapse. A five storey bolstered concrete framed shape symmetrical and Unsymmetrical become considered within the observe to evaluate the call for capability Ratio (D.C.R.), the ratio of the member force and the member electricity as in keeping with U.S. standard services management (GSA) guidelines. The Linear static evaluation is executed the use of software, ETABS V 9.7 in line with Indian widespread codes. Analysis and layout is carried out to get the very last output of layout info. To examine the crumble, normal columns are eliminated one by one, and continued with evaluation and layout. Many such columns are removed in extraordinary trials to recognise the consequences of modern evaluation. Member forces and reinforcement info are calculated. From the analysis, DCR values of beams are calculated.

Keywords – Modern Fall Apart Analysis, U.S. Popular Carrier Administration (GSA) Suggestions, Removal of Columns, Unique Moment Resisting Frames, Call for Potential Ratio (DCR), Capability ,Linear Static Analysis, ETABS


  1. Feng Fu Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65 (2009) 1269_1278.
  2. B.A. Izzuddin, A.G. Vlassis, A.Y. Elghazouli, D.A. Nethercot – Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss Part I: Simplified assessment framework. Engineering Structures 30 (2008) 1308–1318.
  3. Jae-hyouk Choi, Dong-kuk Chang – Prevention of progressive collapse for building structures to member disappearance by accidental actions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22 (2009) 1016– 1019.
  4. Kapil Khandelwal, Sherif El-Tawil – Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis. Engineering Structures 33 (2011) 2653–2661.
  5. Hyun-Su Kim, Jinkoo Kim, Da-WoonAn – Development of integrated system for progressive collapse analysis of building structures considering dynamic effects. Advances in Engineering Software 40 (2009) 1–8.
  6. ASCE-07, 2005, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE 7-05, Reston, VA, USA.
  7. Astaneh-Asl, A, 2003, “Progressive Collapse Prevention in New and Existing Buildings”,Ninth Arab structural Engineering Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE 2003: 1001–1008. AS 2841, 2005, “Galvanized Steel Wire Strand”, Australian Standard.
  8. Abhay A. Kulkarni, Rajendra R.Joshi (2011) “Progressive Collapse Assessment of structure” International Journal Earth Sciences and Engineering , ISSN 0974-5904.
  9. B. M. Luccioni et al (2003),“Analysis of building collapse under blast load,” COINCET, Structure institute, National University of Tucuman, Av Roca 1800, 4000 SM Tucuma, Argentina.
  10. Bilow, D N and Kamara, M, 2004, “U.S. General Services Administration Progressive Collapse Design Guidelines Applied to Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings”, ASCE Structures Congress, Nashville, Tennessee.