Journal Title : International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Science


Author’s Name : G Saravanan | Sankaranarayanan N | Senthamizhan S | Sureshkumar S | Vijay M S

Volume 04 Issue 04 2017

ISSN no :  2348-3121

Page no: 332-337

Abstract – Sugar mills produce a range of by-products during the process of sugar extraction. Mill mud is one of the by-products that is produced in significant volume. Often mill mud is mixed with mill ash from the firing of bagasse, which together forms the bulk of mill waste available for disposal from raw sugar mills. The practice of spreading mill mud over nearby cane fields has been the primary means of disposing mill mud for many years. Mills generally promote the practice by offering freight subsidies to reduce the cost burden on growers who use this practice as a routine measure. The low level of nutrients and high moisture content makes mill mud a dilute source of nutrients, and supply of mill mud often exceed demand, leading to stockpiling of mill mud at most mills. Moreover, the continued application of mill mud and ash at high rates, without appropriate recognition of the soil condition and crop requirements, has raised a number of concerns in recent years. The risk of over – fertilization and heavy metal contamination of cane fields, and the concerns relating to offsite impacts from spillage to waterways, have raised questions about the indiscriminate use of mill mud in the industry. This study examines the issues relating to more responsible management of mill mud and reports on the cost-effectiveness of its application across a wider range of farms more distant from the mills as a means to minimize environmental risks.

Keywords – Plant nutrients, heavy metal concentration, waste management, efficient mill


  1. Barry, G.A., Price, A.M. and Lynch, P.J. (1998), Some Implications of the Recycling of Sugar Industry By-Products, Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference, Townsville, Ballina, vol. 20, pp 52-55.
  2. Barry, G.A., Rayment, G.E., Bloesch, P.M. and Price, A. (2000), “Recycling sugar industry by- products and municipal biosolids on canelands”, in Bruce, R.C, Johnstone, M. and Rayment
  3. G.E. (eds), Environmental short course for sustainable sugar production: Course Manual. Working Paper, Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Sugar Production, Townsville.
  4. Bell, M.J., Garside, A.L., Cunnigham, G., Halpin, N., Berthelsen, J.E. and Richards, C.L. (1998), Grain Legumes in sugarcane farming systems, Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference,20: 97-103
  5. BSES (1994), Salting effects reduced by mill mud, BSES Bulletin, No. 46, April, pp 10-11. Calcino, D.V., 1994, Australian Sugarcane Nutritional Manual, SRDC and BSES publication, Brisban
  6. CANEGROWERS(1998), Code of Practice:
  7. Sustainable Cane Growing in Queensland, Cane growers,
  8. Chapman, L.S. (1996), “Australian Sugar Industry By-Products Recycle Plant Nutrients”, in Hunter, H.M., Eyles, A.G. and Rayment, G.E. (eds), Downstream Effects of Land Use, Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane.
  9. Chapman, L.S., Haysom, M.B.C. and Chardon, C.W. (1981) Checking the Fertility of Queensland’s Sugar Land, Proceedings Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technology
  10. Kingston, G. (1999), A Role for Silicon, Nitrogen and reduced Bulk Density in Yield responses to Sugar Mill Ash and Filter Mud/Ash Mixtures, Proceedings Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technology Conference, pp. 114-121.
  11. Qureshi, M.E., Wegener, M.K. and Mason, F. M. (in press), Economics of sugar mill by-products as a source of nutrients in the Australian Sugar Industry, CRC Publication Series, CRC Sustainable Sugar Production, James Cook University, Townsville.